2000 Prompt: Investigation of Mystery


2000.      Many works of literature not readily identified with the mystery or detective story genre nonetheless involve the investigation of a mystery.  In these works, the solution to the mystery may be less important than the knowledge gained in the process of its investigation.  Choose a novel or play in which one or more of the characters confront a mystery.  Then write an essay in which you identify the mystery and explain how the investigation illuminates the meaning of the work as a whole.  Do not merely summarize the plot.

Orhan Pamuk’s My Name Is Red is essentially a mystery novel, revolving around the murder of a miniaturist. However, even though the story starts with a corpse asking for revenge and ends with the revelation of the murderer, the investigations take a back seat in the story. In fact, it does not even make a difference who is the murderer: the only purpose of even having this plotline is to expose readers to some of the topics in the book, such as the clash between the East and West.

Outline:
1.       How the meaning is revealed
a.       Through anecdotes
                                                               i.      Almost every chapter is full of anecdotes from various Islamic books and histories, e.g. Hüsrev and Shirin, the life of Bihzad, stories of Shahs
b.       Knowing the murderer does not make a difference at all
2.       Revelations from the investigations
a.       Deaths symbolize the deaths of tradition
                                                               i.      Elegant was killed because he disagreed with the new method of painting
                                                              ii.      Enishte was killed because he disagreed with the Islamic idea of eternity
                                                            iii.      However, the souls of the dead still remain and narrate the story
b.       Insight into traditional values:
                                                               i.      the joys of painting (Osman)
c.        Information seeks to make us understand the other side

1. Methods of revelation

The mystery that binds the whole story together is the murder of one of the Sultan’s miniaturists, Elegant Effendi, and then later the murder of Black’s uncle, Enishte Effendi.

Almost all of the discussions on the book’s themes are presented through anecdotes. There are hundreds of anecdotes scattered throughout the narrative, providing numerous insights into the thinking and reasoning of Turkish Ottomans. A few examples of the allusion to other works of literature are stories like Hüsrev and Shirin and . These anecdotes reveal Islamic attitudes to topics such as style and eternity, giving us a sympathetic perspective on the side of the Ottomans. For example, one of the Sultan’s favoured miniaturists, Olive, told three anecdotes about the Qur’an’s concept of eternity and about how “time ends for the one who forsakes the perfect life and perfect illuminating, leaving nothing but death” (Pamuk 120), showing the belief that true eternity can be found in art.

2. Importance of the investigations
The deaths of both Elegant Effendi and Enishte Effendi symbolize the “death” or fading away of Ottoman traditions. Elegant Effendi was killed because he believed that Western art is “heresy, a sacrilege that no decent man would have the gall to commit” (Pamuk 29). What he is referring to is that Western art is the opposite of what the Qur’an teaches about paintings: Islamic art is all about accompanying the story and depicting a “perfect” world of perfectly drawn archetypes. Western art at the time of the Renaissance is about perfectly rendering all imperfections and painting exactly what the eye sees, which is why Enishte is so surprised when he goes to Venice and sees that “you would immediately know which particular nobleman it was [in the portrait]”  (Pamuk 41), because they included all the imperfections of the human appearance.

Consequently, the murderer could also be considered a symbol of the cunning and ruthless Western civilization, who is gradually enveloping other societies with its breathtaking but aggressive culture. This can be explained further by Enishte’s death at the hands of the same murderer, because the murderer refused to accept that the version of eternity provided by the Qur’an, that eventually “[their] methods will die out, our colors will fade… [and] indifference, time and disaster will destroy [their] art” (Pamuk 273).

These investigations also led us to discover other traditional values, such as the Islamic philosophy on paintings. In a particular scene, Master Osman ventures deep down into the Sultan’s Treasury with Black and pores through all the paintings and books in search of clues to the . What they discovered down there revealed incredible things about Ottoman art, history, and philosophy. In particular, that scene reveals the nature of blindness in Master Osman’s perspective: only in blindness can people see the true images Allah sees.

No comments:

Post a Comment